|
3/24/05 - Response prepared
by Terry Egland, Principle, Testing Engineers, Inc.
Rather than address the subject
of hardness and what might be a reasonable tolerance, let's
discuss the point of authority that the evaluator is quoting.
According to an ASTM document "Form and Style for ASTM
Standards" Section A27.1 "Notes
in the text shall NOT include mandaroty requirements. Notes
are intended to set explanatory material apart from the text
itself, either for emphasis or for offering informative suggestions
not properly part of the standard." Therefore, I
would suggest that the Subcommittee C09.61 on "Testing
Concrete for Strength" feels that a comment on hardness
is appropriate but cuts short of mandatory language. The subcommitee
has recommended a hardness number of 55 HRC. A slight difference
from the recommended would not be a violation of the intent
of C39 but a reasonable tolerance is not given.
The same document mentioned
above also discusses Footnotes in Section A26.1. "Footnotes
referenced in the text are intended ONLY for reference and shall
never include any informaton or instructions necessary for the
proper application of the method. Table footnotes area a part
of the table." Therefore, again, we see that no
mandatory language should be outside of the main text of the
document.
|